ArticlePloS one2026
Translating injury prevention evidence into safer padel: Protocol of a TRIPP-guided scoping review.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Padel is a rapidly growing sport with high injury incidence rates and substantial consequences. However, no comprehensive overview exists of the evidence on padel-related injuries and injury prevention strategies. A scoping review can help identify gaps in the emerging field of padel research. The objective of this scoping review is to systematically map the available evidence on padel‑related injuries and injury prevention strategies across all player populations and settings, from epidemiological description to intervention effectiveness. Studies describing injuries or injury risk factors or mechanisms in padel players of any kind and regarding primary injury prevention strategies or interventions involving stakeholders at any socio-ecological level will be considered. Studies that have been conducted in any geographic location, at any playing level, in any setting and in any implementation context will be considered. The proposed scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) will be followed. A three-step search strategy will be utilized. The search strategy will be adapted for PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE and CINAHL. A structured gray‑literature search will also be conducted. The data extracted from included papers will include specific details about the participants, concept, context, study methods and key findings relevant to the review questions. No critical appraisal of individual sources of evidence will be performed. The extracted data will be presented according to the six stages of the Translating Research into Injury Prevention Practice (TRIPP) framework. The review has been registered through Open Science Framework (osf.io/4t69j).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.