ArticlePloS one2026
A role for nucleosome remodellers during resection of deprotected telomeres in yeast.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair pathway choice is strongly influenced by DNA end resection, a process in which the 5' DNA strand is degraded to generate 3' single-stranded DNA required for homologous recombination. Although the enzymatic mechanisms of resection have been well defined, its regulation by the dynamic chromatin environment surrounding the DNA break remains less clear. Here, we used the budding yeast cdc13-1 system to analyse DNA end resection after telomere deprotection. Inactivation of Cdc13, a component of the CST (Cdc13-Stn1-Ten1) telomere-capping complex, exposes telomeric DNA ends and triggers a DNA damage response. Using this system, we examined the contribution of long-range resection nucleases and chromatin regulators. Analysis of long-range resection nucleases revealed that the Dna2 nuclease contributes to telomeric processing, particularly in the absence of the exonuclease Exo1. Genetic removal of chromatin regulatory factors showed that H2A.Z, a histone H2A variant incorporated by the SWR1 complex, did not significantly affect resection, whereas depletion of the major nucleosome eviction complexes RSC and SWI/SNF impaired resection after telomere deprotection. Together, these results indicate that nucleosome eviction allows for efficient resection at deprotected telomeres and the analogies to long-range resection at DSBs illustrate the utility of the cdc13-1 system for studying long-range resection in broader context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.