Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42430316›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society2026

Benchmarking Neural Network Personalized Musculoskeletal Hand Models Against Current Personalization Standards Using Experimental Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Fine-Wire Electromyography.

Maximillian T Diaz, Erica M Lindbeck, Alexis R Benoit, Isaly Tappan, Joel B Harley, Jennifer A Nichols

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maximillian T Diaz
Erica M Lindbeck
Alexis R Benoit
Isaly Tappan
Joel B Harley
Jennifer A Nichols

Funding

Using social networks to map and evaluate team science across CTSA hubsUL1TR001427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MITCHELL, DUANE A. · 2015 to 2024
$37.2M
A Transfer Learning Framework for Creating Subject-Specific Musculoskeletal Models of the HandR21EB030068 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI NICHOLS, JENNIFER A. · 2020 to 2020
$561k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001427NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB030068
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physics-based musculoskeletal models are often used to understand complex systems, like the human hand. Because generic hand models typically represent less than 1% of the population, models are often personalized to match individual people. Multiple personalization approaches exist. Yet, it is unknown which methods are best for studying hand tasks. Here we i) apply five musculoskeletal personalization methods to hand models and ii) evaluate the methods by comparing simulated muscle activations to measured electromyography. The five personalization methods [scaling, joint moment optimization using Neuromusculoskeletal Modeling Pipeline (NMSM), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) segmentation, MRI segmentation combined with joint moment optimization, and a novel neural network] were used to create 14 personalized models for each participant (n = 13 healthy adults). The models were then used to simulate seven range of motion and eight isometric hand tasks in the inverse direction using static optimization. In contrast to current personalization methods that require extensive experimental data and processing, we demonstrated musculoskeletal hand models could be personalized using only lateral pinch force data and a custom neural network. None of the personalization methods resulted in anatomically accurate muscle parameter sets, when compared to the anatomical standard of MRI segmentation. However, the neural network method led to significantly lower errors when predicting muscle activations compared to current state-of-the-art methods for personalizing musculoskeletal model parameters without personalizing associated neural control models. By reducing the experimental data and time barriers required to create personalized hand models, neural networks may allow for wider use of musculoskeletal models in clinical settings.

Indexed as

ElectromyographyHandMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerAdultAlgorithmsBenchmarkingBiomechanical PhenomenaComputer SimulationFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansIsometric ContractionMaleModels, BiologicalMuscle, Skeletal

Identifiers

PMID42430316
PMCPMC13551466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.