ArticleHuman heredity2026
Investigation of the Effects of Noncoding
Article in Human heredity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCoding and noncoding variants of the LDLR gene have been reported to cause familial hyperlipidaemia (FH) and rare coding variants have been shown to increase risk of hyperlipidaemia in the general population.
methodsHyperlipidaemia status had previously been assigned for 470,000 UK Biobank participants in a study of rare coding variants. Effects of variants obtained from whole-genome sequencing in the five-prime untranslated region (5'UTR) and promoter region of LDLR were analysed using this phenotype. Variants previously reported to be implicated in FH and associated with altered LDLR expression were entered into logistic regression analysis. Other variants in these regions with minor allele frequency ≤0.01 were entered into a weighted burden test. For this analysis, insertion-deletion variants were weighted according to rarity while single-nucleotide variants were additionally weighted using 2 pathogenicity predictors, CADD and GPN-MSA.
resultsThe previously reported common variant, rs17248720C>T, was confirmed to slightly reduce hyperlipidaemia risk. Two previously reported rare variants which were associated with markedly reduced LDLR expression, c.-101T>C and c.-121T>C, had at most only moderate effects on hyperlipidaemia risk. In the weighted burden analysis, promoter variants annotated with CADD showed evidence for association with increased risk (p = 0.00097). However, the effect size was small, with variants having CADD scores exceeding 0.5 having OR = 1.07 (0.99-1.15).
conclusionAlthough rare noncoding variants do have detectable effects on hyperlipidaemia risk, these effects are much smaller than those detected for coding variants in the same sample. This research has been conducted using the UK Biobank Resource.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.