Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42430267›Full record

ArticleGynecologic and obstetric investigation2026

Prediction Model and Novel Classification System for Complications after Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy.

Andrea Stuart, Karin Källen, Michael Conditt, Hanna Källen Murray, Jan Baekelandt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic and obstetric investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrea StuartInstitute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, andrea.stuart@med.lu.se.
Karin KällenInstitute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Michael CondittMomentis Surgical, Yoni Netanyahu 6, Or Yehuda, Israel.
Hanna Källen MurraySavantic AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jan BaekelandtDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of the study was to develop and validate a novel model for predicting complications in minimally invasive hysterectomy and to define a standardized classification system, the Hysterectomy Complication Classes (HCCs).

designThis is a retrospective cohort study using merged data from four national Swedish registries. Data were randomly split into development and validation datasets. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors and construct the prediction model, which was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC_AUC). Participants/Materials: There were a total of 60,424 benign hysterectomies recorded in the Swedish National Quality Register for Gynecological Surgery, the Swedish National Drug Registry, Statistics Sweden, and the Swedish National Patient Registry.

settingThe study setting comprised nationwide Swedish population-based registries covering benign hysterectomy procedures performed across Sweden.

interventionsThe intervention consisted of minimally invasive hysterectomy performed using vaginal, laparoscopic, or robotic techniques, with uterus weight and surgical indication as key exposure variables.

methodsMultivariable logistic regression models estimated odds ratios (ORs) for risk factors associated with a composite complication outcome. The final model was applied to the validation dataset, and predictive performance was assessed using the ROC_AUC. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was a composite complication measure including perioperative complications, blood loss >300 mL, conversion to open surgery, postoperative complications, reoperation, or antibiotic prescription within 6 weeks.

resultsKey risk factors for complications were indication for hysterectomy, BMI, previous cesarean section, age, and uterus size, with a significant interaction between uterus size and surgical technique. The highest risk was observed in patients with uterus weight >1 kg undergoing vaginal hysterectomy (VH) (adjusted OR 25.5, 95% CI 3.3-199.8). Predicted complication probabilities were used to define five HCCs, ranging from HCC 1 (0-20%) to HCC 5 (81-100%). Validation demonstrated strong predictive accuracy across risk strata. LIMITATIONS: The composite outcome includes heterogeneous complications of varying clinical significance. Registry-based data may be subject to misclassification or underreporting. External validation outside Sweden has not yet been performed.

conclusionThis comprehensive predictive model and the proposed HCC classification system provide a structured approach to estimating complication risk in minimally invasive hysterectomy. By accounting for patient variability and surgical factors, the HCC system supports individualized preoperative counseling and enhances comparability between surgical techniques.

Indexed as

ComplicationsHysterectomyMinimally invasive surgeryPrediction modelUterus size

Identifiers

PMID42430267
PMCPMC13493089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.