ArticleJMIR formative research2026
Effects of an e-Coach Program on the Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Patients Self-administering Their First Insulin Injection: Quasi-Experimental Study.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The current level of insulin knowledge, attitudes, and practices of patients self-administering their first insulin injection needs to be improved. There is an emerging need to develop a program for patients self-administering their first insulin injection based on the e-coach model derived from the temporal self-regulation theory. Objective: This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of a temporal self-regulation theory-based e-coach program on the knowledge, attitude, and practice of patients self-administering their first insulin injection. Methods: A quasi-experimental research design was used, and the study adhered to the Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Nonrandomized Designs statement. The study was developed and evaluated in a level IIIA hospital between May 1 and December 1, 2022, in Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China. The control group received care as usual. The intervention group received a self-regulation program called the e-coach program: the "COACHING" implementation steps. The insulin attitude scores and insulin knowledge-practice scores were compared using repeated-measures ANOVA. In particular, given that baseline blood glucose monitoring frequency differed significantly between the 2 groups, thereby compromising their comparability, a repeated-measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed, with monitoring frequency entered as a covariate. This approach was adopted to enhance the scientific rigor of the findings and reduce potential bias. Results: In total, 86 patients were enrolled; of these, 75 patients were followed up, 40 in the experimental group and 35 in the control group. Repeated-measures ANOVA results revealed statistically significant between-group effects (F1,73=47.67, P<.001), time effects (F2,146=5.02, P=.02), and interaction effects (F2,146=4.75, P=.03) for total insulin knowledge scores in both groups. In both groups, statistically significant between-group effects (F1,73=16.04, P<.001) and interaction effects (F2,146=12.52, P<.001) were observed for total insulin attitude scores, but time effects (F2,146=2.47, P=.11) were not statistically significant. In both groups, statistically significant between-group effects (F1,73=0.66, P=.004) were observed for total insulin practice scores, but time effects (F2,146=1.05, P=.35) and interaction effects (F2,146=2.82, P=.08) were not statistically significant. Conclusions: The e-coach program based on the TST was effective in improving insulin knowledge and insulin attitude but was not proven effective for insulin practice. A longer follow-up study is needed to uncover its long-term benefits on clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.