ReviewMolecular neurobiology2026
The Role of PGC-1α in Neurodegenerative Diseases: Molecular Mechanisms, Translational Challenges, and Therapeutic Potential.
Review in Molecular neurobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurodegenerative diseases (NDDs) are progressive disorders in which mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, proteostasis failure, neuroinflammation, and synaptic damage progressively interact to drive neuronal vulnerability. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha (PGC-1α) links metabolic adaptation to stress-response pathways that are repeatedly disrupted in Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, polyglutamine (PolyQ) disorders, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Rather than providing only an updated catalogue of studies, this review organizes the evidence into a cross-disease rheostat framework that explains why PGC-1α modulation is protective in some settings but incomplete or maladaptive in others. Current findings indicate that PGC-1α supports mitochondrial biogenesis, oxidative phosphorylation, antioxidant defense, mitophagy, autophagy, protein quality control, and inflammatory balance. However, its effects are highly context dependent. In several models, restoration of PGC-1α-related signaling improves mitochondrial function and reduces neuronal injury, whereas broad, sustained, or cell-inappropriate activation may produce limited benefit or undesirable outcomes. These observations suggest that PGC-1α is not a simple neuroprotective switch, but a flexible regulatory hub whose therapeutic value depends on cell type, isoform profile, disease stage, and activation level. Emerging strategies, including small-molecule modulators, gene delivery, antisense-based approaches, nanoparticle systems, and exercise-related interventions, remain largely preclinical and face major barriers related to CNS delivery, pathway selectivity, dose and cell-type control, peripheral safety, and validated target-engagement biomarkers. Nevertheless, clinical translation requires stronger causal validation, reliable target-engagement biomarkers, selective delivery methods, and long-term safety assessment. Future research should focus on precision-based modulation of PGC-1α to determine when and how this pathway can be safely used for disease modification. Such a careful approach may help transform PGC-1α from a broad experimental target into a clinically relevant strategy for well-defined neurodegenerative phenotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42430091What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.