ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2026
Brand audit attribution of plastic litter in the African Great Lakes: dominance of national manufacturers and implications for extended producer responsibility.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plastic pollution is an established environmental crisis, but the responsibility of specific producers remains poorly understood particularly in freshwater systems. The present study applies brand audit-based attribution to identify the manufacturers associated with branded plastic litter collected during a large-scale citizen science clean-up campaign across the Tanzanian shorelines of the African Great Lakes (Lakes Victoria, Tanganyika, and Nyasa (Malawi), A dataset of 11,207 litter items with visible and validated branding was dominated by plastics (9951 items, 88.8%), mainly comprised of single use "fast-moving consumer goods". Beverage bottles constituted the largest plastic item category (64.9%), followed by soft packaging (1379 items, 13.9%) and food wrappers (1242 items, 12.5%). In total, 292 brands and 148 manufacturers were identified. Corporate contributions were highly concentrated, with three manufacturers (Jambo Group of Companies, Bakhresa Food Products Ltd, and MeTL Group) accounting for 52.9% of branded plastic litter, while 29 manufacturers explained 95.1%. Overall, 91.4% of branded plastic litter was attributable to Tanzanian manufacturers, with regional and international manufacturers representing minor fractions. This pronounced concentration and national embedding of responsibility suggest that Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) frameworks may be particularly feasible in this context. Coordinated and transparent action to finance waste infrastructure and implement EPR mechanisms, such as bottle return schemes, would send a clear and credible signal of commitment to pollution mitigation. Whilst community-led clean-ups have an important role, without parallel producer responsibility measures and infrastructure development, the burden of waste management continues to fall disproportionately on local communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.