ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2026
Deep-learning denoising for ultrahigh-resolution photon-counting detector CT: phantom and in vivo evaluation of non-calcified coronary plaques.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To assess the value of convolutional neural network (CNN)-based denoising for the evaluation of non-calcified coronary plaques on ultrahigh-resolution (UHR) photon-counting detector (PCD) coronary CT angiography (CCTA). A dynamic phantom containing lipid-rich and fibrotic plaques with 50%-diameter stenosis (PDS) was scanned on PCD-CT under varying conditions. For in-vivo imaging, consecutive patients with non-calcified coronary plaques (NCPs) who underwent CCTA with PCD-CT were included. Image series were reconstructed using a sharp vascular kernel (Bv64) with slice thicknesses of 0.2 mm/0.4 mm, quantum iterative reconstruction (QIR) levels 3/4, and with/without CNN denoising. Phantom-based line-profile analysis yielded edge-width at half maximum (EWHM) and 10-90% rise distance as sharpness metrics. Plaque contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and PDS were assessed in the phantom and in patients. Two readers evaluated subjective image quality (noise, diagnostic confidence) using a four-point Likert scale. Pairwise comparisons were performed using a Bonferroni-corrected p < 0.002 for significance. Fifty-five patients (median age 74 [66.5-78] years; 19 women) with 97 NCPs were included. Phantom-based sharpness metrics remained unchanged after denoising (all pairwise p > 0.051). CNN denoising increased plaque CNR consistently in the phantom (fibrotic: 0.80-1.64 to 0.92-2.06; lipid-rich: 0.21-0.34 to 0.35-0.46) and in vivo (0.99-2.07 to 1.37-2.92, all pairwise p < 0.001). Denoising did not alter PDS values in phantom or in vivo plaques (all pairwise p > 0.006). Subjective image noise and diagnostic confidence improved across all reconstructions (all pairwise p < 0.001). CNN-based denoising of UHR PCD-CT improves image quality of non-calcified coronary plaques, while preserving sharpness and quantitative stenosis metrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42430068What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.