Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42430068›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2026

Deep-learning denoising for ultrahigh-resolution photon-counting detector CT: phantom and in vivo evaluation of non-calcified coronary plaques.

Sardi Hyska, Muhammad Taha Hagar, José Osoria-Velasquez, Nicola Fink, Jens Ricke, Moritz C Halfmann, Hugo Marques, Elliot McVeigh, George Wesbey, Pál Maurovich-Horvat and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Sardi HyskaDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-9482-7752
Muhammad Taha HagarDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9826-2372
José Osoria-VelasquezDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-1307-314X
Nicola FinkDepartment of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 15 Marchioninistraße, 81377, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3089-9606
Jens RickeDepartment of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 15 Marchioninistraße, 81377, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8762-8594
Moritz C HalfmannDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7550-0171
Hugo MarquesUNICA Radiology, MRI unit Hospital da Luz Lisboa, Católica Medical School, 100 Av. Lusíada, Cardiovascular, Lisboa, 1500-650, CT, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8210-2075
Elliot McVeighDepartment of Medicine, UC San Diego School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Dr, La Jolla, 92093, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1684-2432
George WesbeyDepartment of Cardiology and Radiology, Scripps Clinic, 9888 Genesee Ave, La Jolla, 92037, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0089-0149
Pál Maurovich-HorvatDepartment of Radiology, Medical Imaging Center, Semmelweis University, 2 Koranyi Sandor street, Budapest, 1083, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0885-736X
Bálint SzilveszterHeart and Vascular Centre, Semmelweis University, 68 Varosmajor street, Budapest, 1122, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9280-4441
Tilman EmrichDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4156-7727
Akos Varga-SzemesDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA. musccvi@musc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2781-7462
Milan Vecsey-NagyDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9306-289X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess the value of convolutional neural network (CNN)-based denoising for the evaluation of non-calcified coronary plaques on ultrahigh-resolution (UHR) photon-counting detector (PCD) coronary CT angiography (CCTA). A dynamic phantom containing lipid-rich and fibrotic plaques with 50%-diameter stenosis (PDS) was scanned on PCD-CT under varying conditions. For in-vivo imaging, consecutive patients with non-calcified coronary plaques (NCPs) who underwent CCTA with PCD-CT were included. Image series were reconstructed using a sharp vascular kernel (Bv64) with slice thicknesses of 0.2 mm/0.4 mm, quantum iterative reconstruction (QIR) levels 3/4, and with/without CNN denoising. Phantom-based line-profile analysis yielded edge-width at half maximum (EWHM) and 10-90% rise distance as sharpness metrics. Plaque contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and PDS were assessed in the phantom and in patients. Two readers evaluated subjective image quality (noise, diagnostic confidence) using a four-point Likert scale. Pairwise comparisons were performed using a Bonferroni-corrected p < 0.002 for significance. Fifty-five patients (median age 74 [66.5-78] years; 19 women) with 97 NCPs were included. Phantom-based sharpness metrics remained unchanged after denoising (all pairwise p > 0.051). CNN denoising increased plaque CNR consistently in the phantom (fibrotic: 0.80-1.64 to 0.92-2.06; lipid-rich: 0.21-0.34 to 0.35-0.46) and in vivo (0.99-2.07 to 1.37-2.92, all pairwise p < 0.001). Denoising did not alter PDS values in phantom or in vivo plaques (all pairwise p > 0.006). Subjective image noise and diagnostic confidence improved across all reconstructions (all pairwise p < 0.001). CNN-based denoising of UHR PCD-CT improves image quality of non-calcified coronary plaques, while preserving sharpness and quantitative stenosis metrics.

Indexed as

coronary artery diseasecoronary computed tomography angiographynon-calcified plaquephoton-counting detectorultrahigh-resolution

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.