Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42430047›Full record

Observational studyJournal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology2026

Dexmedetomidine in The Treatment of Toxicologic Conditions in The Emergency Department: A Dual-Center Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.

Kevin Baumgartner, Amar Chakraborty, David B Liss, Sarah Berg, Miya Smith, Taylor Kaser, Rachel Ancona, Julianne C Yeary, Samantha C Lee, Jon B Cole

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kevin BaumgartnerDivision of Medical Toxicology, Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. baumgartner.k@wustl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0875-423X
Amar ChakrabortyMinnesota Regional Poison Control Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
David B LissDivision of Medical Toxicology, Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Sarah BergDivision of Medical Toxicology, Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Miya SmithDivision of Medical Toxicology, Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Taylor KaserDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Rachel AnconaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Julianne C YearyBarnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Samantha C LeeMinnesota Regional Poison Control Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Jon B ColeMinnesota Regional Poison Control Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Funding

Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences (KL2) KL2TR002346 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Dominic N Reeds · 2017 to 2026
$14.0M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002346NCATS NIH HHS KL2-TR002346
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDexmedetomidine has been used to treat toxicologic conditions, but high-quality data on its use for this indication in the emergency department setting are lacking. We sought to characterize the use of dexmedetomidine in this context.

methodsWe conducted a dual-center retrospective cohort study of patients treated with dexmedetomidine in two academic emergency departments. We included patients who received dexmedetomidine in the emergency department and had a toxicologic condition, as adjudicated by a medical toxicologist on chart review. We abstracted data from the electronic medical record. We conducted multilevel logistic regression to explore factors associated with intubation after the initiation of dexmedetomidine.

resultsWe screened 1,081 patients and included 320. The most common toxicologic conditions were ethanol withdrawal (20%) and acute poisoning by sympathomimetics (19.7%). Culprit xenobiotics were primarily ethanol and substances of misuse. Median nadir heart rate and mean arterial pressure after dexmedetomidine initiation were normal, and there was no substantial change in nadir hemodynamic parameters after dexmedetomidine administration, although there was an increase in vasopressor administration (6.6% to 11.9%). Among patients who were not intubated when dexmedetomidine was initiated (n = 200), the frequency of intubation was 21.5% (95% CI 16-28). On multilevel logistic regression, antipsychotic administration was associated with increased odds of intubation (adjusted odds ratio 2.52, 95% CI 1.15-5.51).

conclusionDexmedetomidine was primarily used to treat emergency department patients with intoxication or withdrawal from ethanol and substances of misuse. The frequency of intubation in spontaneously breathing patients after the initiation of dexmedetomidine was 21.5%. Further prospective research is needed to evaluate dexmedetomidine in the treatment of toxicologic conditions.

Indexed as

Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor AgonistsDexmedetomidineEmergency Service, HospitalPoisoningSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleRetrospective StudiesAdrenergic alpha-2 Receptor AgonistsDexmedetomidineDexmedetomidineEmergency departmentIntoxicationPoisoning

Identifiers

PMID42430047
PMCPMC13407800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.