ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2026
Current Treatment Options for Adult Grade 2 IDH-mutant Diffuse Gliomas in the Vorasidenib Era: Patient Selection, Sequencing, and Practical Management.
Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- IDH-Mutant Diffuse Glioma: From Metabolic Origins to Targeted Therapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementManagement of adult WHO CNS grade 2 IDH-mutant diffuse gliomas has entered a more precise postoperative era. Vorasidenib has changed the discussion because it can slow progression and delay the next intervention in selected patients, but the key therapeutic question is not whether mutant IDH inhibition is active; it is where it should be placed relative to observation, reoperation, radiotherapy, and alkylating chemotherapy. We believe treatment should begin with maximal safe resection, integrated molecular diagnosis, and a careful assessment of residual non-enhancing disease, growth kinetics, symptoms, seizure burden, neurocognitive priorities, fertility goals, and patient preference. Observation remains appropriate after gross-total or near-total resection, in patients with absent or minimal residual disease, stable serial MRI, controlled seizures, and no immediate need for durable cytoreduction. Vorasidenib is best framed as an active-delay strategy for patients with measurable, non-enhancing, clinically stable residual or recurrent grade 2 IDH-mutant astrocytoma or oligodendroglioma, particularly when radiotherapy and chemotherapy can reasonably be deferred and preservation of cognition, work capacity, quality of life, or fertility options is a major priority. It should not be presented as a universal substitute for definitive local or adjuvant therapy. Radiotherapy followed by PCV, or selected temozolomide-based approaches when PCV is not feasible, remains appropriate for rapid growth, symptomatic mass effect, new or nodular enhancement, neurological decline, uncontrolled seizures, high-risk molecular pathology such as CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion, or suspected grade transformation. During surveillance or vorasidenib, treatment failure should be judged by trajectory rather than a single scan. Sustained T2/FLAIR volumetric growth, new enhancement, worsening seizures, steroid requirement, functional decline, or need for next intervention should prompt multidisciplinary re-review, repeat tissue sampling when useful, and timely transition to radiochemotherapy, salvage surgery, or clinical-trial enrollment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42430039What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.