ReviewMolecular biology reports2026
How WRKY transcription factors fine-tune specificity in plant stress responses: from W-box to regulatory code.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
WRKY transcription factors are among the largest plant-specific transcription factor families and play central roles in coordinating gene expression during biotic and abiotic stress. Despite decades of research, a fundamental paradox remains: WRKY proteins bind short, widely distributed W-box cis-elements yet generate highly selective, context-dependent transcriptional outputs in vivo. In this review, we argue that WRKY specificity is not determined by DNA binding alone but emerges from the integration of five regulatory layers: cis-regulatory motif grammar, chromatin accessibility and epigenetic state, protein-protein interactions, post-translational modifications and proteostasis, and signaling context, which we collectively define as the WRKY regulatory code. We discuss how chromatin state controls which genomic W-box sites are physically accessible, while post-translational modifications and cofactor interactions determine which accessible sites are productively engaged and whether the transcriptional output is activation or repression. Representative mechanistic examples illustrate how different combinations of these regulatory layers generate precise, condition-dependent transcriptional programs. We further discuss how multi-omics integration and machine learning-based predictive modeling can decode and empirically test this regulatory code across stresses, tissues, and developmental contexts. The regulatory code perspective resolves key inconsistencies in WRKY biology and provides a practical conceptual framework for more targeted manipulation of stress-responsive transcriptional networks in crops.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.