ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Prediction of future onset of allergic rhinitis and analysis of risk factors in children with food allergy during infancy.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The atopic march describes the progression from infantile food allergy (FA) to allergic rhinitis (AR) in later childhood. However, not all children with FA follow this trajectory, and predictors for AR development in this particular cohort remain poorly characterized. This study aims to identify factors influencing AR development in infants with FA and construct a predictive model for clinical application. A prospective cohort included 447 infants (0-2 years) with positive food allergens, followed up to 6 years with questionnaire/clinical data. After preprocessing, feature selection was performed using variance inflation factor (VIF) and Lasso regression. Five machine learning models (logistic regression, SVC, random forest, XGBoost, and KNN) were trained and validated using stratified fivefold cross-validation and an independent test set. In cross-validation, logistic regression achieved the highest mean AUC of 0.9403 (95% CI 0.9040-0.9766), and SVC obtained the best F1 score (0.9341). On the test set (n = 90), logistic regression maintained the highest AUC (0.8466), while random forest achieved a recall of 1.0. The top predictive features identified were parental allergy history, frequency of antibiotic use, cephalosporin use, and daily duration of tobacco smoke exposure.
conclusionThe machine learning prediction model, particularly logistic regression, shows good practical value for early identification of FA infants at high risk of developing AR. Early avoidance of the identified modifiable risk factors may aid primary and secondary prevention. WHAT IS KNOWN: • The atopic march from food allergy (FA) to allergic rhinitis (AR) is well-recognized, yet outcomes are heterogeneous and pediatricians lack validated risk tools for infants with FA. WHAT IS NEW: • This study identifies three easily assessable predictors (parental AR history, tobacco exposure duration, and antibiotic use frequency) and validates a Multinomial Naive Bayes model (AUC=0.915) that accurately stratifies AR risk in FA children, significantly outperforming traditional regression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42429983What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.