ArticleDysphagia2026
Evaluation of Dysphagia in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Diagnostic Patterns and Opportunities for Multidisciplinary Care.
Article in Dysphagia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To assess the frequency of dysphagia diagnosis in patients with OSA, characterize the use of clinical and instrumental swallowing evaluations, and identify gaps in care contributing to the underdiagnosis of unsafe swallowing in this population. Patients with OSA were identified using ICD-10 code G47.33 in the TriNetX Research Network, and those who had not undergone polysomnography were excluded. The prevalence of dysphagia (ICD-10 R13.1) and associated sequelae, including aspiration pneumonia (ICD-10 J69.0), was evaluated. Swallowing assessments were captured using CPT codes for clinical and instrumental evaluations. Of 1,328,355 patients with OSA, 15% had a documented diagnosis of dysphagia. The majority were coded with unspecified dysphagia (85%), followed by oropharyngeal dysphagia (21%). Sequelae of dysphagia, including aspiration pneumonia, malnutrition, and gastrotomy tube dependence, were seen in 19.1% of patients with both OSA and dysphagia. Despite this, only 29.56% of dysphagic patients underwent formal swallowing assessment. Specifically, 20.53% received a videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) and 1.55% underwent flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). Diagnostic yield varied by modality: 77.1% of patients undergoing instrumental evaluation were diagnosed with dysphagia, compared to 29.0% with clinical evaluation alone. Dysphagia is underrecognized in patients with OSA, with most diagnoses made without formal assessment despite substantial aspiration risk. Instrumental evaluations significantly improve diagnostic accuracy but remain underutilized. These findings highlight the need for standardized, multidisciplinary screening protocols to improve the detection and management of dysphagia in the OSA population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42429965What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.