ArticleClinical oral investigations2026
Effects of whitening toothpastes on the optical and surface properties of single-, group-, and multi-shade universal composites.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of whitening toothpastes containing blue covarine or activated charcoal on the color change, surface roughness, microhardness, and gloss of single-, group-, and multi-shade universal composites. MATERIALS AND
methodsEach of three composite resin groups (Omnichroma-supra-nanospherical single-shade; Neo Spectra ST HV-nanoceramic group-shade; and Filtek Z550-nanohybrid multi-shade) were divided into three subgroups (n = 15) based on the whitening toothpastes used: Distilled water (brushing without paste), Curaprox White is Black, and Signal White Now. Baseline measurements for color, surface roughness, microhardness, and gloss were made on each of the specimens. Subsequently, all specimens were immersed in coffee for 6 days to simulate 6 months of coffee consumption, after which the measurements were repeated. The stained specimens were subsequently brushed with an electric toothbrush for 24 min to simulate the effect of brushing teeth for 6 months. Again, measurements were made following this toothbrushing process. Additionally, one specimen from each subgroup was prepared for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis. To evaluate if data had normal distributions, the Shapiro-Wilk test was used. Normally distributed data were analyzed using a generalized linear model followed by Tukey's post-hoc test. Non-normally distributed data were evaluated using robust ANOVA and Holm-corrected robust t-tests through the use of Walrus package. Quantitative data were reported as mean ± standard deviation or trimmed mean ± standard error. The statistical significance threshold was set at p < 0.05.
resultsOmnichroma showed the greatest color change, whereas Filtek Z550 showed the smallest. The Neo Spectra ST HV subgroup brushed with Signal White Now showed the highest efficacy in stain removal. The highest surface roughness after brushing was observed in the specimens brushed with Curaprox White is Black, with no statistically significant difference compared to those brushed with Signal White Now. Microhardness was ranked independently of toothpaste and time as Filtek Z550 > Neo Spectra ST HV > Omnichroma. There were statistically significant differences in gloss values depending upon the type of composite resin being tested, the type of toothpaste being tested and the time of testing (p < 0.001).
conclusionWhitening toothpastes with blue covarine and activated charcoal partially reduced coffee-induced staining on universal composite resins but caused an increase in surface roughness of composite resins as well as a decrease in gloss. On the other hand, the toothpastes had no significant effect on the microhardness values of the composite resins. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Whitening toothpastes may contribute to the reduction of extrinsic stains on composite restorations. However, since these toothpastes contain abrasives, they may increase the roughness of surface and decrease the gloss of restorative materials. As such, clinicians should be aware of the possible effects of whitening toothpaste on the surface characteristics of composite restorations prior to making recommendations to patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42429848What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.