ArticleMicrobial ecology2026
Tracking Microbiome Composition and Stability Across Indian Social Honeybees Foraging in a Homogeneous Mustard Crop Landscape.
Article in Microbial ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbial communities are essential for host health and ecosystem stability. However, whether host identity or shared foraging resources shapes microbiome structure among co-occurring species remains poorly understood. We studied bacterial and fungal communities of four Indian honeybee species in a mustard monoculture resource condition, integrating behavioural observation-based pollinator data with microbial co-occurrence networks derived from metabarcoding. Microbiome composition was more strongly associated with host identity rather than with foraging behaviour, bee abundance, or landscape use. This has strong implications for how microbial sharing among co-occurring social honeybee species can be limited, thereby preventing them from influencing each other's microbiomes through shared foraging and driving variable pollinator health within a shared ecosystem. While core bacterial taxa were shared, relationships among bacterial cobionts, unlike those among fungal genera, remained species-specific. Microbial diversity, along with community structure and function, influenced network stability, with a highly modular microbial network of Apis cerana exhibiting more predicted network robustness to simulated perturbations. In summary, host-specific filtering shaped the microbiome more than resource homogenisation, with closely related species facing unique risks of disruption of microbial co-occurrence, with broader implications for vulnerability to microbiome imbalance, environmental stress, and emerging infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.