Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42429683›Full record

ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2026

Turning "what is on the exam" panic into prep: AI-generated study guide and multi-format questions in biology.

Fareha Razvi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Fareha RazviDepartment of Biology, Metropolitan Community College, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-7964-4081

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An AI-assisted methodology is suggested to generate learning materials. This methodology is proposed to provide students with additional practice and guidance, potentially bridging the gap between classroom instruction and exam expectations. In this proposed approach, pre-prepared multiple-choice questions (MCQs) from unit examinations served as the basis for creating AI-assisted study guides that highlighted key terms and concepts. These MCQ-based study guides were further transformed into multi-format questionnaires that offered diverse practice opportunities to reinforce understanding, promote active learning, and enhance student engagement. This AI-assisted study guide and multi-format questionnaires were supplemented to one of the sections of general biology at Metropolitan Community College, Omaha, NE. The informal feedback of students was positive about the supplemented material. This proposed methodology provides a conceptual framework for integrating AI into instructional design. Additionally, this scalable strategy offers adjunct instructors to support student learning, improve study efficiency, and enhance exam preparedness.

Indexed as

active learningadjunct facultyAIbiologyMCQsmulti-format questionsstudy guideundergraduate

Identifiers

PMID42429683
PMCPMC13520660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.