ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2026
Binocular Non-Cycloplegic Ocular Parameters for Modeling Cycloplegic SER in Children.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate an interpretable binocular modeling approach for predicting cycloplegic spherical equivalent refraction (SER) in children while accounting for inter-eye correlation. Methods: Clinical data from children aged 4 to 17 years were collected at 2 centers. Participants were stratified into three age groups. The binocular approach constructed inter-eye features, including means, differences, and error-related metrics. A linear mixed-effects model (LMM) with subject-specific random intercepts was applied. Model performance was evaluated using R², mean absolute error (MAE), mean square error (MSE), and root mean square error RMSE. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used to quantify feature contributions. Results: In internal validation, the optimal binocular models achieved R² values of 0.882, 0.957, and 0.969, with MAE values of 0.399 diopter (D), 0.285 D, and 0.232 D in the 4 to 5, 6 to 12, and 13 to 17 years age groups, respectively. In external validation, the best binocular models achieved R² values of 0.834, 0.947, and 0.969, with MAE values of 0.488 D, 0.287 D, and 0.354 D in the 3 age groups. SHAP analysis revealed axial length/corneal curvature radius (AL/CR) and AL predominated in children aged 4 to 5 years; non-cycloplegic SER was the determinant in those aged 6 to 12 years; non-cycloplegic SER and its mean became dominant in adolescents aged 13 to 17 years. Conclusions: The binocular modeling approach shows potential for improving accuracy of refractive status prediction in children, and the integration of interpretability methods further supports its utility as an auxiliary tool in large-scale vision screening programs. Translational Relevance: This study translates ocular biometric modeling into clinical practice by providing an interpretable binocular approach to support risk assessment and preliminary screening in pediatric myopia management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.