Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42429466›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of social determinants of health and health services2026

Power, Politics, and Policy in the Making of Health Inequities: An Empirical Study of Equity-Oriented Policy Actors in Canada.

Arnel M Borras

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of social determinants of health and health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Arnel M BorrasRankin School of Nursing, St. Francis Xavier University, 4130 University Avenue, Antigonish, Nova Scotia B2G 2W5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2237-0980

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structural health inequities in Canada remain entrenched-and in some areas have intensified-despite decades of commitments to equity. This study examines how power relations shape the conditions under which health equity policy reform is pursued and constrained. Grounded in critical political economy, the analysis draws on 23 semi-structured interviews with Canadian policy scholars, advocates, union leaders, and health professionals engaged in equity-oriented work. Thematic analysis identified four interrelated dynamics shaping health equity policymaking: institutional arrangements that privilege capital accumulation over redistribution; the institutionalization of corporate power within policymaking; neoliberal governance norms that narrow politically feasible policy responses; and fragmentation within civil society that weakens sustained collective pressure for redistributive change. Together, these dynamics illuminate how power is organized across economic, political, and institutional domains, contributing to persistent health inequities despite formal equity commitments. While participants referenced participation, consultation, and access to decision making, these mechanisms were experienced within policy environments characterized by structural power asymmetries. Rather than attributing inequities to evidence gaps or implementation failures, the analysis situates them as outcomes of political-economic arrangements shaping policy feasibility. Advancing health equity therefore requires confronting structural power relations and strengthening collective capacity for redistributive and democratic change beyond the health sector.

Indexed as

Health EquityHealth InequitiesHealth PolicyPolicy MakingPoliticsPower, PsychologicalCanadaHumansCanadacivil societycorporate power and influencecritical political economy of healthdemocratic constraintshealth equity policyneoliberal governancepolicymakingredistributive reformstructural power

Identifiers

PMID42429466
PMCPMC13646418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.