Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42429452›Full record

ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2026

Deep learning embedded latent class joint modelling of time-to-event and longitudinal data.

Tristan John Elers Harris, Najmeh Nakhaei Rad, Sphiwe Bonakele Skhosana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tristan John Elers HarrisDepartment of Statistics, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-4848-760X
Najmeh Nakhaei RadDepartment of Statistics, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-7831-5614
Sphiwe Bonakele SkhosanaDepartment of Statistics, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-4740-7540

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Joint modelling of longitudinal and time-to-event data is a powerful tool for analysing complex medical data. Joint latent class models (JLCMs), in particular, provide additional prognostic insight by clustering subjects into latent subgroups within a mixture of experts framework. Traditionally, the mixing proportions are modelled using a multinomial logistic regression. Recent work in mixture regression has proposed a neural network alternative, implemented through the neural network expectation-maximization algorithm, which offers greater flexibility by capturing nonlinearities that may be missed by logistic regression. In this article, we extend the JLCM by applying the neural network to the modelling the mixing proportions captured in the class-membership submodel. The model estimated using an expectation-maximization-type algorithm. We call this the neural-network JLCM (NN-JLCM). We formally define the method, evaluate its performance through extensive simulations, and apply it to real data. The results show that NN-JLCM improves predictive accuracy and class separation compared with traditional JLCMs, while maintaining competitiveness in terms of overall model fit. The code for the article is available at https://github.com/tharris0924/nn-jlcm_p1.

Indexed as

Deep LearningLatent Class AnalysisModels, StatisticalAlgorithmsComputer SimulationHumansLogistic ModelsLongitudinal StudiesNeural Networks, ComputerPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning Modelsjoint latent class modeljoint modellinglongitudinal modellingMixtures of expertsneural networkssurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID42429452
PMCPMC13478454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.