ArticleAnalytical chemistry2026
An Integrated Raman Platform with Embedded AI for Intraoperative Real-Time Cancer Detection.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Raman spectroscopy workflows are often fragmented across proprietary tools and ad hoc data-processing scripts, which slow decision-making and limit reproducibility and auditability. We present an integrated Raman platform with a Python-based GUI application that interfaces with the optical system(s) to unify instrument control, automate data acquisition, noise removal, signal processing, and run an embedded AI model for real-time classification of experimental samples. The system automatically archives intermediate and final outputs for auditability. We validated the platform's output for two types of experimental specimens: Tylenol and peritumoral biological samples from human laryngeal tissues. We compared the results with other studies, commercial software, and previous data-processing algorithms. The results obtained were consistent across all comparators. To demonstrate native analytics within the same workflow, we also developed and embedded a 1D convolutional neural network (CNN) tailored for biological Raman spectra. The multilayered CNN was trained on ex vivo human laryngeal tissue Raman spectra and was evaluated across 50 independent runs. The model achieved a mean test accuracy of 0.8929 ± 0.0213, a sensitivity of 0.9086 ± 0.0321, a specificity of 0.8698 ± 0.0434, and a mean AUC of 0.9506 ± 0.0142. The average latency across 50 runs was 2.82 s from signal acquisition to prediction, with device acquisition accounting for most of the time. The key innovation is not only the embedded AI but also an end-to-end, auditable workflow that unifies device control, acquisition, signal processing, visualization, and the archival of intermediate and final outputs, with optional real-time inference within a single platform.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.