ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2026
Real-world effectiveness of HPV vaccination against high-risk type HPV DNA positivity among adult women aged 18 - 45years in China: A matched test-negative design study.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extensive evidence confirms the high effectiveness of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines in young girls; however, real-world data on vaccine effectiveness (VE) among women vaccinated at ages 18-45 remain limited, particularly in China, where HPV status at vaccination is often unknown. We conducted a population-based matched test-negative design study using linked cervical cancer screening and immunization records in Shenzhen, China. Cases positive for vaccine-type high-risk HPV (hrHPV) DNA were matched 1:1 with negative controls by age, screening date, household registration, and screening type. VE for at least one dose was estimated using conditional logistic regression and stratified by time since vaccination, vaccine valency, and age at vaccination. Among 7,060 matched pairs, overall VE increased significantly with time since vaccination: 6.4% (95% CI: -3.9% to 15.7%) at <1y, 17.9% (5.5% to 28.7%) at 1-<2y, and 40.2% (29.6% to 49.2%) at ≥2y. Among women vaccinated ≥2y earlier, VE against HPV16/18 was 48.4% (33.7% to 59.8%) for 2-/4-valent vaccines and 54.4% (26.5% to 71.7%) for the 9-valent vaccine. Significant protection at≥2y was observed across all age-at-vaccination groups: 45.7% (25.0% to 60.7%) for ages 18-26, 39.6% (23.5% to 52.4%) for ages 27-35, and 35.5% (12.6% to 52.4%) for ages 36-45. In conclusion, HPV vaccination confers moderate protection against vaccine-type hrHPV DNA positivity among Chinese women vaccinated at ages 18-45. However, as this outcome reflects a single-time-point surrogate virologic endpoint rather than persistent infection or clinical disease, adult women should continue regular cervical cancer screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.