ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2026
Strategies for Identifying Molecules of Interest in Large Chemical Spaces.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years make-on-demand compound libraries (so-called Chemical Spaces) have gained more and more interest in pharmaceutical industry. Compound vendors promise cheap compounds, fast delivery, high synthetical accessibility and a large pool of novel chemical matter, fulfilling the requirements of fast Design-Make-Test cycles. Searching in ultralarge Chemical Spaces with known 2D similarity metrics, like fingerprint-based Tanimoto, substructure, or pharmacophore similarity searches, contains pitfalls due to the representation of molecules as synthons with connectivity rules. Applied to a set of almost 3000 drug-relevant queries we analyzed the ability of similarity search methods to retrieve analog compounds from Chemical Spaces, and how to best approach typical use cases in early phase drug discovery. Distinct characteristics of each similarity metric suggest orthogonal complementarity, enabling a versatile framework to diverse challenges present in hit discovery and lead expansion campaigns. Our investigations resulted in formulating practical considerations and guidelines for interpreting the scores including recommendations for thresholds for each similarity metric.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.