Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42429353›Full record

SynthesisApplied psychology. Health and well-being2026

Music making and wellbeing: A systematic review of methods, musical activities, and outcomes.

Cecilia Steinmacher, Clemens Wöllner

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Applied psychology. Health and well-being, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cecilia SteinmacherSystematic Musicology, University of Music Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0006-3053-8532
Clemens WöllnerSystematic Musicology, University of Music Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8508-3508

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on music making and wellbeing reports positive effects across psychological, physiological, and social dimensions. A closer look, nevertheless, reveals that most of these studies solely focus on group singing and define wellbeing in various and occasionally limited ways. This systematic review aimed at identifying the different research designs of quantitative studies in the field, structuring the musical activities, and summarizing the wellbeing outcomes. A comprehensive literature search in five databases resulted in a total of 50 papers that were included in the current review. Results showed that the majority of studies used quasi-experimental designs with active or passive control conditions. Group and individual singing were most frequently studied. As for psychological wellbeing, studies with positive or no evidence are nearly balanced, with the exception of choral studies in younger and middle-aged adults that predominantly provided positive evidence. Physiological wellbeing was measured mostly in singing activities with mixed results. Social wellbeing was primarily reported for group singing activities, with predominantly positive evidence. Taken together, this review underlines the need for including a wider range of music making activities in research on wellbeing, a careful selection of the respective research designs, and a balanced use of wellbeing measures.

Indexed as

MusicPsychological Well-BeingSingingHumansmusic makingphysiological wellbeingPRISMApsychological wellbeingsocial wellbeing

Identifiers

PMID42429353
PMCPMC13353040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.