Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42429125›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association2026

Real-World Use of Avelumab First-Line Maintenance for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma in Japan: Treatment Patterns, Effectiveness, and Safety.

Eiji Kikuchi, Takashi Kobayashi, Michihiro Shono, Jason Hoffman, Hiroshi Kitamura

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Visualizing Baseline Eligibility Across Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer Trials and Real-World Cohorts.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eiji KikuchiDepartment of Urology, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1624-6676
Takashi KobayashiDepartment of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1069-2816
Michihiro ShonoMedical Department, Merck Biopharma Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Jason HoffmanEMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc., Billerica, Massachusetts, USA.
Hiroshi KitamuraDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.

Funding

Merck.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple first-line (1L) and subsequent systemic treatment options are now available for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC), making shared decision-making increasingly important. In addition to clinical trial data, clinicians need real-world data (RWD) that describes effectiveness, safety, and contemporary treatment sequences in clinical practice. One 1L treatment option for patients with la/mUC is platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) followed by avelumab maintenance in patients without disease progression. This narrative review summarizes Japanese RWD from three complementary studies of avelumab 1L maintenance-post-marketing surveillance, JAVEMACS, and JAVEMACS-D. These studies show that avelumab maintenance has a predictable and acceptable safety profile in Japanese clinical practice and is being used in an older and more clinically heterogeneous population than that enrolled in JAVELIN Bladder 100. These RWD also describe frequent use of cisplatin-containing chemotherapy, individualized timing of transition to maintenance, and increasing use of enfortumab vedotin after avelumab. Of note, the interpretation of some of these findings requires caution because of immortal time bias, treatment selection bias, and patient attrition before maintenance initiation. Additionally, this sequential strategy applies to a selected population without progression after induction PBC and should be interpreted in the context of the current treatment landscape, which also includes intensified 1L combination treatment options such as enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab and gemcitabine-cisplatin plus nivolumab. Overall, these Japanese RWD can complement randomized clinical trial data by informing discussion of treatment trajectories, feasibility, and trade-offs, thereby supporting more individualized and patient-centered treatment decisions in contemporary la/mUC clinical practice in Japan.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Transitional CellUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAntibodies, MonoclonalCisplatinDisease ProgressionHumansJapanMaintenance ChemotherapyProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalavelumabCisplatinenfortumab vedotinAvelumabcarcinomaEnfortumab vedotinJapanshared decision makingtransitional cell

Identifiers

PMID42429125
PMCPMC13352444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.