Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42429042›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2026

Enhancing machine learning-based binder design with high-throughput screening: A comparison of mRNA and yeast display technologies.

Zhiyuan Yao, McGuire Metts, Avery K Huber, Jingjing Li, Tomoaki Kinjo, Henry Dieckhaus, Amrita Nallathambi, Albert A Bowers, Brian Kuhlman

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Amplicon/Protein Bead Display enables quantitativebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zhiyuan YaoDepartment of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4812-9850
McGuire MettsDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Avery K HuberDivision of Chemical Biology and Medicinal Chemistry, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Jingjing LiDivision of Chemical Biology and Medicinal Chemistry, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Tomoaki KinjoDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Henry DieckhausDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Amrita NallathambiDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Albert A BowersDivision of Chemical Biology and Medicinal Chemistry, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Brian KuhlmanDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4907-9699

Funding

GPU workstation for deep learning-based protein design and cryo-EM data processingR35GM131923 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BRIAN A KUHLMAN · 2019 to 2026
$6.1M
MIRA Equipment SupplementR35GM125005 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Albert A Bowers · 2017 to 2026
$3.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35GM125005NIGMS NIH HHS R35GM131923
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in machine learning (ML)-based protein design methods have enabled the rapid in silico generation of large libraries of miniprotein binders with minimal manual input. While computational design capacity has scaled rapidly, experimental validation methods have lagged, creating a bottleneck in binder discovery pipelines. Here, we apply mRNA display to screen an ML-designed miniprotein binder library and directly compare its performance with the more widely used yeast surface display platform using a single shared DNA library. We screened 2009 designs targeting the platelet receptor TLT-1 and 3159 designs targeting the immune receptor B7-H3 across both platforms. While both selection protocols reliably identified functional binders, we found that mRNA display preferentially enriched binders with slower dissociation rates. In addition, mRNA display achieved higher library coverage than yeast display, likely rescuing functional designs that are penalized in a cell-based expression system. Biophysical characterization of selected binders from both platforms revealed strong binding affinities and high thermal stabilities. These results showcase the power of integrating ML-based computational design tools with rapid in vitro selection technologies, providing a scalable framework for therapeutic miniprotein discovery.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Screening AssaysMachine LearningProtein EngineeringRNA, MessengerSaccharomyces cerevisiaeHumansProtein BindingRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID42429042
PMCPMC13352141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.