Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42429023›Full record

ReviewProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2026

Applications and limitations of AI tools in enzyme design.

Rosa Teijeiro-Juiz, Nina Egeler, Grzegorz Jamróg, Marion Ringel, Thomas Brück, Bruno Di Geronimo, Bernhard Loll

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Applications and limitations of AI tools in enzyme design.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rosa Teijeiro-JuizInstitute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Laboratory of Structural Biochemistry, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0009-0000-3403-6755
Nina EgelerWerner Siemens-Chair of Synthetic Biotechnology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), TUM School of Natural Sciences, Garching, Germany.
Grzegorz JamrógWerner Siemens-Chair of Synthetic Biotechnology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), TUM School of Natural Sciences, Garching, Germany.ORCID 0009-0007-0554-3943
Marion RingelWerner Siemens-Chair of Synthetic Biotechnology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), TUM School of Natural Sciences, Garching, Germany.
Thomas BrückWerner Siemens-Chair of Synthetic Biotechnology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), TUM School of Natural Sciences, Garching, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2113-6957
Bruno Di GeronimoSchool of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1822-7142
Bernhard LollInstitute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Laboratory of Structural Biochemistry, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7928-4488

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 101072686Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 101168583Werner Siemens-Stiftung
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enzymes catalyze various different chemical reactions often with high efficiency and selectivity compared to synthetic catalysts. Advances in protein engineering over the past decades have allowed researchers to design enzymes, improving their catalytic performance and adapting them for specific or entirely novel chemical reactions. However, the need for the experimental validation of thousands of computational designs remains one of the major bottlenecks. Yet another restriction is our still limited knowledge about transition state architectures, effects of mutations, active-site dynamics just to name a few. To overcome this, the combination of experimental and computational methods is essential, yet many experimentalists are facing significant obstacles when entering the field of computational enzyme design. To address these obstacles, this review offers a comprehensive introduction and overview of several current artificial intelligence (AI)-driven methods available for enzyme design, with a focus on reaction-to-sequence design, structure prediction, substrate scope prediction, engineering of stable variants, design of enzymes with non-canonical amino acids, and de novo design. Subsequently, this work serves as an accessible guide for experimental researchers with interest in learning how to use AI-based computational methods in enzyme engineering.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEnzymesProtein EngineeringCatalytic DomainEnzymesartificial intelligencede novo designenzyme designnon‐canonical amino acidsprotein engineeringprotein stability

Identifiers

PMID42429023
PMCPMC13351933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.