ReviewProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2026
Applications and limitations of AI tools in enzyme design.
Review in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applications and limitations of AI tools in enzyme design.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Review
- Bridging Algorithms and Biocatalysis: Perspectives on AI-Supported Enzyme Engineering.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Enzymes catalyze various different chemical reactions often with high efficiency and selectivity compared to synthetic catalysts. Advances in protein engineering over the past decades have allowed researchers to design enzymes, improving their catalytic performance and adapting them for specific or entirely novel chemical reactions. However, the need for the experimental validation of thousands of computational designs remains one of the major bottlenecks. Yet another restriction is our still limited knowledge about transition state architectures, effects of mutations, active-site dynamics just to name a few. To overcome this, the combination of experimental and computational methods is essential, yet many experimentalists are facing significant obstacles when entering the field of computational enzyme design. To address these obstacles, this review offers a comprehensive introduction and overview of several current artificial intelligence (AI)-driven methods available for enzyme design, with a focus on reaction-to-sequence design, structure prediction, substrate scope prediction, engineering of stable variants, design of enzymes with non-canonical amino acids, and de novo design. Subsequently, this work serves as an accessible guide for experimental researchers with interest in learning how to use AI-based computational methods in enzyme engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.