ArticleHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2026
Nurse and caregiver skill mix, staffing levels, and staff allocation in long-term care facilities: A scoping review.
Article in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: More older people require healthcare services, increasing the demand for nursing care. Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are required to avail nurse staffing, a skill mix and allocation that is aligned with residents' acuity and within prescribed legislation. However, facilities struggle to maintain the prescribed nurse staffing. Aim: A scoping review was conducted to map the available literature on implementing nurse and caregiver staffing models within LTCFs regarding skill mix, staffing levels, and staff allocation aligned with residents' acuity. Setting: Studies conducted in formal long-term care settings for older people. Methods: The review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute's methodological framework. The search included four databases: PubMed and MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library-Wiley, and Sabinet African Journals, for studies published from 2010 to 2024. Trustworthiness was ensured by applying principles such as credibility, dependability, confirmability, and researcher reflexivity. The final sample comprised 20 studies. Results: Staffing levels for all categories of nurses and caregivers were often lower than recommended by experts. The number of registered nurses versus caregivers in the total staff mix was low, with caregivers providing most of the resident care. The use of acuity-adjusted staffing was not often reported. Conclusion: The appropriate type and number of staff in LTCFs are essential. In addition, allocating the correct type and number of staff according to residents' acuity levels may improve resident outcomes. Contribution: This review may inform policymakers regarding the implementation of staffing models and the importance of aligning the allocation of tasks with the nurses' scope of practice, the caregivers' job descriptions, and the residents' acuity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.