ArticleHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2026
Patient satisfaction with private optometry service in South Africa.
Article in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patient satisfaction with private optometry service in South Africa.Health SA = SA Gesondheid · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patient satisfaction plays a vital role in the healthcare sector, holding significance for both medical providers and patients. Aim: The study investigated patient satisfaction levels regarding the quality of care delivered by private optometry services in South Africa. Setting: The study was conducted across all nine provinces in South Africa, with a specific focus on individuals utilising private optometry services. Methods: This study employed a quantitative, cross-sectional design to evaluate patient satisfaction levels regarding service quality in private optometry practices within South Africa, utilising questionnaires disseminated through social media platforms for data collection. Results: Our study included 283 participants, with a mean age of 36.3 ± 10.41 years, predominantly female (69.8%) and Black African (96%), and found high satisfaction scores with optometrists. The primary reasons for visiting optometrists in our cohort were spectacle or contact lens renewal (34.9%), routine check-ups (24.5%) and addressing reduced vision (24.5%). Among those who switched optometrists, 40.8% cited relocation and 17.9% reported service dissatisfaction. The mean overall satisfaction score was 4.38 ± 0.66, with high ratings for cleanliness, physical facilities and staff conduct. Conversely, waiting time and cost received relatively lower scores. Conclusion: Participants were highly satisfied with private optometry services in South Africa, although cost and waiting time had comparatively lower ratings. Contribution: The study provides evidence on patient satisfaction in private optometry and highlights areas for service improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.