ArticleEuropean heart journal. Imaging methods and practice2026
Sex differences in photon-counting computed tomography findings across hypertrophic phenotypes.
Article in European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) enables simultaneous assessment of left ventricular morphology, function, and myocardial tissue characterization. Whether sex influences PCCT findings across hypertrophic phenotypes remains uncertain. Methods and results: We studied consecutive adults with a left ventricular hypertrophic phenotype undergoing PCCT. Patients were classified as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM), or secondary left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). Sex differences in PCCT-derived left ventricular mass index, volumes, ejection fraction (EF), late iodine enhancement (LIE), and extracellular volume (ECV) were assessed overall and by aetiology. In patients with clinically indicated cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) within ±12 months, sex effects on CT-CMR agreement were also evaluated. Among 182 patients, 50 were women and 132 were men; 83 had paired PCCT-CMR data. In the overall cohort, women had lower left ventricular mass index, smaller left ventricular volumes, higher EF, slightly lower ECV, and lower LIE extent than men. In HCM, women and men showed similar wall thickness, left ventricular mass, LIE burden, and ECV. In secondary LVH, women had smaller volumes and higher EF, without meaningful differences in tissue markers. In ATTR-CM, women appeared less remodelled and less infiltrative, although only four women were included. CT-CMR agreement for wall thickness, left ventricular mass, EF, scar extent, and ECV was similar in women and men. Diagnostic ECV thresholds were also consistent across sexes. Conclusion: Sex influences PCCT hypertrophic phenotypes mainly through remodelling and functional adaptation rather than major differences in tissue characterization. CT-CMR agreement and diagnostic ECV thresholds appear robust across sexes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.