SynthesisFrontiers in public health2026
Myopia prevalence in Malaysian children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Myopia is a growing global concern, projected to affect nearly half the world's population by 2050. East and Southeast Asia face a disproportionate burden, with early-onset cases leading to severe complications in children. In Malaysia, epidemiological data on childhood myopia remain limited and inconsistent, hindering accurate burden estimation. Aim: To systematically review and synthesize the prevalence of myopia among Malaysian children aged 4-18 years, providing national and subgroup-specific estimates. Methodology: A PRISMA-compliant search was conducted across five databases. Eligible studies included cross-sectional, cohort, or population-based designs published in English. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data. A random-effects meta-analysis using the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation pooled prevalence rates from 17 studies. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses explored heterogeneity by age, ethnicity, region, cycloplegia status, and diagnostic method. Publication bias was assessed via funnel plots, Egger's, Begg's, and trim-and-fill methods. Study quality was appraised using the JBI checklist. Results: Of 1,147 records, 21 studies were included in the synthesis, with 17 suitable for meta-analysis ( Conclusion: Childhood myopia represents an important public health concern in Malaysia. However, the magnitude of prevalence should be interpreted with caution because of high heterogeneity, variation in myopia definitions, and the predominance of non-cycloplegic measurement methods, all of which may cause the unadjusted estimate to overestimate clinically confirmed prevalence. Although the unadjusted pooled prevalence was 25.0%, the trim-and-fill adjusted estimate of 15.8% and the cycloplegic subgroup estimate of approximately 16% suggest that the clinically confirmed prevalence is likely to lie closer to the lower end of an approximate range of 16 to 25%. Future nationally representative studies using standardised cycloplegic refraction and consistent diagnostic criteria are needed to guide resource allocation, screening, and policy planning. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251012425, CRD420251012425.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.