SynthesisFrontiers in public health2026
Effects of digital multimodal interventions on objectively measured physical activity in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: With the acceleration of global population aging, low physical activity levels have become a primary threat to the health of older adults. Consequently, digital health interventions (DHIs) based on objective monitoring tools (e.g., accelerometers, wearable devices) are progressively emerging as a novel means to promote active health in older adults. Objective: This study aims to quantitatively evaluate the actual effects of DHIs based on objective monitoring data on the physical activity levels of older adults through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and CINAHL were searched up to April 12, 2026. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that utilized objective instruments, such as accelerometers or smart sensors, to record DHIs promoting physical activity in older adults were included. A random-effects model was used for the meta-analysis, with mean differences (MD) applied to evaluate effect sizes. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2.0). Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed to explore sources of heterogeneity, and a trim-and-fill method was implemented for stress testing. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated using the GRADE system. Results: Ultimately, 21 RCTs involving 2,962 participants were included. Meta-analysis results demonstrated that DHIs significantly increased daily steps in older adults [MD = 381.58, 95% CI (237.58, 525.58), Conclusion: Limited low-certainty evidence suggests that DHIs may have potential promotive benefits in increasing the total amount of daily activity in older adults, but their robustness in driving MVPA remains insufficient. Digital interventions exhibit relatively better behavioral promotive benefits when targeting populations with specific health risks, but they should not be considered a standalone means to improve exercise intensity in clinical promotion. Future research and development should explore transitioning from simple data recording to intelligent closed-loop systems that incorporate intensity regulation and multidimensional feedback, thereby enhancing the robustness of intervention effects. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420261366882, CRD420261366882.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.