ArticleACS omega2026
Theoretical Model and Experimental Validation of Coalbed Methane Adsorption/Desorption Dynamics in Cylindrical and Spherical Coal Particles.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coal, as a porous medium, exhibits a strong adsorption capacity for gas. The laws governing gas adsorption and transport are critical research topics for gas disaster prevention and control, as well as for coalbed methane (CBM) extraction. This study takes coal samples from the Guobei Mine as the research subject. Isothermal adsorption experiments under constant pressure conditions were conducted on coal particles of different sizes to investigate the influence of particle size and initial pressure on gas adsorption capacity and adsorption rate. Based on the density gradient diffusion theory, mathematical models for gas adsorption in both cylindrical and spherical coal particles were established. These models were nondimensionalized, solved using the finite difference method for simulation analysis, and subsequently validated against experimental results. The research indicates that under the same initial pressure, smaller coal particle sizes result in a larger cumulative adsorption capacity and a faster adsorption rate. For particles of the same size, a higher initial pressure leads to a greater saturated adsorption capacity and a shorter time to reach adsorption equilibrium. The cumulative gas adsorption capacity conforms to an empirical model where ″the reciprocal of adsorption capacity shows a linear relationship with 1/t
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.