ArticleACS omega2026
Preparation of Optical-Based Sensors for the Determination of Cardiac Myosin-Binding Protein C.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, cardiac myosin-binding protein-C (cMyBP-C) imprinted and nonimprinted poly-(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-N-methacryloxy-(L)-tryptophan) polymeric film-based surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensors were prepared for the detection of cMyBP-C using the microcontact imprinting method. The surface characterization of cMyBP-C imprinted (MIP) and nonimprinted (NIP) SPR sensors was investigated using contact angle measurements and atomic force microscopy. Kinetic analyses were performed in the concentration range of 0.05-300 ng/mL, and the limits of detection and quantification were calculated as 0.019 and 0.064 ng/mL, respectively. Equilibrium, adsorption, and desorption cycles were completed for 10 min in all of the kinetic analyses. The selectivity studies of MIP SPR and NIP SPR sensors were performed using the template molecule cMyBP-C with competing molecules creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) and cardiac troponin T (cTnT). The relative selectivity coefficients of the MIP SPR sensor for cMyBP-C/cTnT and cMyBP-C/CK-MB were found to be 3.85 and 12.64 times, respectively. The applicability of the MIP SPR sensor was determined using solutions prepared in artificial plasma samples, both in the SPR system and by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.