ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2026
Impact of Institutional Expected Practice Guidelines on Oral and Long-acting Intravenous Antibiotic Use for Serious Bacterial Infections.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Expected practice interventions are a low resource antimicrobial stewardship strategy to standardize prescribing behavior by clinicians. An expected practice intervention to encourage use of oral and long-acting IV (PO/LAIV) antibiotics for serious infections was implemented at a US tertiary care hospital in November of 2022. Methods: We conducted a quasi-experimental pre/post study to evaluate the effect of guideline release on a primary outcome of length of stay (LOS) and secondary outcomes of inpatient antibiotic days, 3-month readmission, PO/LAIV antibiotic use, microbiologic failure, and adverse drug events. We also assessed key factors associated with use of PO/LAIV therapy receipt. Results: Among 139 encounters, we found a significant increase in the proportion of encounters in which PO/LAIV therapy was prescribed after the intervention (42.0% vs 60.0%, Conclusions: Expected practice intervention implementation was associated with an increase in PO/LAIV therapy use and a reduction in readmission, supporting its role as a promising, low-resource antimicrobial stewardship strategy warranting further prospective evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.