Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42428751›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2026

Peripheral nerve biopsy in pure neural leprosy: a 26-year experience in Brazil.

Ana C Siquara-de-Sousa, Mariana Hacker, Robson T Vital, Izabela J R Pitta, Clarissa Spitz, Cristiane C Domingues, Anna M Sales, Leila Chimelli, Sergio L G Antunes, Euzenir N Sarno and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ana C Siquara-de-SousaLeprosy Laboratory, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5553-4929
Mariana HackerLeprosy Laboratory, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, Brazil.
Robson T VitalLeprosy Laboratory, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, Brazil.
Izabela J R PittaLeprosy Laboratory, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, Brazil.
Clarissa SpitzLeprosy Laboratory, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, Brazil.
Cristiane C DominguesLeprosy Laboratory, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, Brazil.
Anna M SalesLeprosy Laboratory, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, Brazil.
Leila ChimelliPaulo Niemeyer State Brain Institute, Rio de Janeiro 20230-024, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6059-0872
Sergio L G AntunesLeprosy Laboratory, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, Brazil.
Euzenir N SarnoLeprosy Laboratory, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, Brazil.
Roberta O PinheiroLeprosy Laboratory, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, Brazil.
Marcia R JardimLeprosy Laboratory, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brazil ranks second globally in leprosy burden, with approximately 25 000 cases reported in 2022. This study aimed to analyse the 26-year experience (1997-2023) in nerve biopsies at a specialized leprosy outpatient clinic, focusing on their usefulness in diagnosing peripheral neuropathy in patients with clinical and neurophysiological features suggestive of leprosy but lacking dermatological lesions. Tissue samples were preserved in glutaraldehyde, buffered formalin and liquid nitrogen, with histopathological analysis using various staining techniques and molecular testing on frozen material. In 819 cases, 529 were diagnosed with leprosy (64.6% overall leprosy diagnosis rate), and 207 pure neural leprosy cases were confirmed. Other conditions identified included vasculitis, diabetic neuropathy and amyloidosis, while 16.5% of cases yielded inconclusive results. The predominant clinical symptoms included sensory disorders (85.7%), localized paraesthesia (70.3%) and muscle weakness (59.4%), with multiple mononeuropathies frequently observed on electroneuromyography. The most biopsied nerves were the ulnar cutaneous branch (50.6%), sural (37.2%) and superficial peroneal (6.8%). Nerve biopsy proved valuable for confirming leprosy and distinguishing differential diagnoses in complex cases, particularly when clinical findings alone were insufficient. Integrating clinical-pathological correlation optimized diagnostic accuracy, underscoring the importance of this tool in managing suspected neural leprosy and guiding treatment in challenging cases.

Indexed as

databasedifferential diagnosisperipheral nervous system diseasessural nerve

Identifiers

PMID42428751
PMCPMC13348849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.