ArticleBrain communications2026
Peripheral nerve biopsy in pure neural leprosy: a 26-year experience in Brazil.
Article in Brain communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brazil ranks second globally in leprosy burden, with approximately 25 000 cases reported in 2022. This study aimed to analyse the 26-year experience (1997-2023) in nerve biopsies at a specialized leprosy outpatient clinic, focusing on their usefulness in diagnosing peripheral neuropathy in patients with clinical and neurophysiological features suggestive of leprosy but lacking dermatological lesions. Tissue samples were preserved in glutaraldehyde, buffered formalin and liquid nitrogen, with histopathological analysis using various staining techniques and molecular testing on frozen material. In 819 cases, 529 were diagnosed with leprosy (64.6% overall leprosy diagnosis rate), and 207 pure neural leprosy cases were confirmed. Other conditions identified included vasculitis, diabetic neuropathy and amyloidosis, while 16.5% of cases yielded inconclusive results. The predominant clinical symptoms included sensory disorders (85.7%), localized paraesthesia (70.3%) and muscle weakness (59.4%), with multiple mononeuropathies frequently observed on electroneuromyography. The most biopsied nerves were the ulnar cutaneous branch (50.6%), sural (37.2%) and superficial peroneal (6.8%). Nerve biopsy proved valuable for confirming leprosy and distinguishing differential diagnoses in complex cases, particularly when clinical findings alone were insufficient. Integrating clinical-pathological correlation optimized diagnostic accuracy, underscoring the importance of this tool in managing suspected neural leprosy and guiding treatment in challenging cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.