ReviewIranian journal of public health2025
Evaluating the Significance of Coagulation Tests for the Prevention and Treatment of Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation: A Meta-Analysis.
Review in Iranian journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We aimed to assess the clinical significance of obstetric coagulation tests in the prevention and treatment of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and to analyze the characteristics of changes in key coagulation indicators during pregnancy and delivery. Methods: The system searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of science, Wanfang Data knowledge service platform, VIP and China Knowledge Network databases for relevant literature from inception to Aug 2024. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted the information and evaluated the risk of bias of the included studies. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata/SE 16.0 software. Results: Twelve studies involving 2531 cases were included. Key findings versus non-pregnant women showed: significantly higher maternal D-dimer (Mean Difference (MD)=1.08, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.61, 1.56) and fibrinogen (MD=1.57, 95%CI: 1.04, 2.10); and lower prothrombin time (PT) (MD=1.13, 95%CI: 0.43, 1.83) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) (MD=0.73, 95%CI: 0.31, 1.16). Longitudinal trends across pregnancy trimesters were also significant: D-dimer increased from 0.24 mg/L to 0.46 mg/L and 0.72 mg/L ( Conclusion: Obstetric coagulation tests effectively reflect changing coagulation status during pregnancy, providing great value for early DIC prevention and intervention. Regular monitoring of key indices can help optimize clinical DIC management and offer more comprehensive strategies for obstetric patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.