ArticleSisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni2026
Multifocal and Multicentric Breast Cancer: Evaluation of Clinicopathological Features and Survival Outcomes.
Article in Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The reported incidence of multifocal breast cancer (MFBC) and multicentric breast cancer (MCBC) varies widely in the literature. This study aimed to compare the clinicopathological characteristics, treatment approaches, and survival outcomes between patients with MFBC/MCBC and those with unifocal breast cancer (UFBC). Methods: Data from 666 female patients aged >18 years who were histopathologically diagnosed with breast cancer and followed up at the Department of General Surgery of a tertiary hospital between January 2018 and January 2025 were retrospectively reviewed. MF and MC were defined based on tumor localization within breast quadrants and the distance between foci. Clinical, pathological, and treatment-related parameters were compared between the groups. Results: Of all patients, 83.5% (n=556) had UFBC and 16.5% (n=110) had MF/MCBC. The mean age was 54.89±12.17 years. Axillary lymph node positivity was significantly higher in the MF/MCBC group (p=0.022). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) identified MF/MCBC in 71% of cases, demonstrating greater sensitivity than mammography (MMG) and ultrasonography (USG). Mastectomy was performed in 85.4% of patients with MF/MCBC compared with 45% of those in the UFBC group. The rate of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was also significantly higher among patients with MF/MCBC (p=0.008). There were no significant differences between the groups regarding local recurrence, distant metastasis, or overall survival. Conclusion: Patients with MF/MCBC exhibited higher rates of axillary involvement and more frequent use of neoadjuvant therapy. However, overall survival was comparable to that of patients with UFBC. A multidisciplinary approach remains essential for determining the optimal management strategy in this subgroup.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.