ArticleCirculation reports2026
Outcomes of Robotic Mitral Valve Repair for Degenerative Mitral Valve Regurgitation in Patients Aged ≥80 Years: Its Role in the Era of Expanding Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair.
Article in Circulation reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) has increasingly been used for elderly patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR), while minimally invasive surgical approaches such as robotic mitral valve repair (RMVr) may offer durable repair with reduced invasiveness. We evaluated the safety and durability of RMVr in octogenarians with DMR and assessed its role in contemporary treatment strategies by comparison with younger patients as a reference cohort. Methods and Results: We retrospectively analyzed 412 patients who underwent RMVr for DMR from 2018 to 2025. Patients were divided into an elderly group (E; age ≥80 years; n=42) and a younger group (Y; age <80 years; n=370). Octogenarians had higher operative risk with more atrial fibrillation, heart failure, pulmonary hypertension, and renal dysfunction. Cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times, repair complexity, and concomitant procedures were comparable. In the E group, hospital mortality and stroke were both 2.4%; there were no conversions to sternotomy, re-explorations for bleeding, or new renal replacement therapy. At discharge, mitral regurgitation was none or trivial in most patients in both groups. At 5 years, overall survival was lower in the E group (80.3% vs. 97.3%), but freedom from cerebrovascular events, reoperation, and moderate or greater mitral regurgitation was similar. Conclusions: RMVr is a feasible and durable surgical option in selected octogenarians considering patient-specific risk, anatomical suitability, and institutional expertise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.