ArticleCirculation reports2026
Cost-Effectiveness of Atrioventricular Synchronous Leadless Pacing in Patients With Atrioventricular Block: Results and Implications From an Exploratory Analysis for Japan.
Article in Circulation reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Atrioventricular (AV) synchronous pacing with a transcatheter pacing system (TC-PM) is an alternative to transvenous pacemakers (TV-PM) in patients with AV block. In this study we assessed the potential cost-effectiveness of TC-PM in Japan and methodological implications for future global cost-effectiveness analyses. Methods and Results: A decision-analytic Markov model captured strategy-specific complication rates, device replacements, and health-related quality of life. Parameter inputs were derived from systematic literature search, clinical studies, and claims data. The discounted lifetime incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER, in JPY per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained) was evaluated against a 5 million JPY per QALY willingness-to-pay threshold. Extensive scenario and sensitivity analyses were conducted. TC-PM was associated with lower complication rates (3.8% vs. 9.8% at 36 months, hazard ratio 0.39; P<0.001) and a lifetime cost increase of JPY632,849 (JPY2,268,945 vs. JPY1,636,096). TC-PM concurrently added 0.24 (3.33 vs. 3.09) QALYs, rendering TC-PM cost-effective in the base case (ICER JPY2,640,519 per QALY gained), but not all scenarios. Long-term quality-of-life assumptions, as also evidenced by a recent Japanese government study, are an important driver of cost-effectiveness. Conclusions: AV-synchronous pacing with a TC-PM is associated with lower complication rates and some improvement in projected quality-adjusted survival that can render it a cost-effective intervention in the Japanese healthcare system as long as some of the observed short-term quality-of-life benefit is maintained.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.