ArticleInternational journal of therapeutic massage & bodywork2026
Efficacy of Myofascial Release Compared to Isometric Relaxation Combined with Active Stretching for Rhomboid Trigger Points: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.
Article in International journal of therapeutic massage & bodywork, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) in the rhomboid muscles contribute to pain, muscle tightness, and restricted movement, impacting quality of life. Various interventions, including myofascial release (MFR) and isometric relaxation (IR), have been used to alleviate symptoms. Aim: This pilot study aims to explore the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of MFR combined with active stretching versus IR combined with active stretching in the management of rhomboid MTrPs, with the goal of informing the design of future full-scale studies. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 50 participants diagnosed with rhomboid MTrPs. Participants were assigned to two groups: group A (MFR with active stretching) and group B (IR with active stretching). Interventions were administered for 4 weeks (five sessions per week). Pre- and post-intervention assessments were conducted using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and goniometric measurements of range of motion (ROM). Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon method and Mann-Whitney U test via SPSS version 27. Results: After 4 weeks, group A showed a statistically and clinically significant reduction in NPRS scores from 7.28 ± 0.737 to 5.28 ± 1.061 (p < 0.001, Conclusion: This study concluded that both treatments were successful in addressing rhomboid trigger points. MFR combined with active stretching demonstrated greater pain reduction and improved flexibility. These findings suggest MFR with active stretching may be a valuable addition to clinical health practice guidelines for managing rhomboid trigger points.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.