ArticleInternational journal of therapeutic massage & bodywork2026
Evaluation of The Spurgeon Method
Article in International journal of therapeutic massage & bodywork, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study design: A single-group pretest-posttest interventional mixed-methods study with longitudinal follow-up. Introduction: After breast cancer surgery, women often experience reduced range of motion in the shoulder and chronic pain that negatively affect mental and physical quality of life and ability to complete daily activities. Purpose: To assess The Spurgeon Method Methods: Women recovering from breast cancer surgery were recruited from local oncology clinics, cancer centers, and breast cancer support groups. Participants had The Spurgeon Method Results: Thirty-three women participated in the study: mean (standard deviation) age = 54.1 (10.2) years, range 35-78 years. Participants demonstrated improved range of motion in all planes of motion (all p < 0.03). QuickDASH scores for perceived ability to complete daily activities and pain also improved from the first session to the last (both p < 0.001). Conclusions: Results suggest The Spurgeon Method
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.