Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42428559›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2026

Impairment of object recognition, object location and spatial working memory performance in inbred RHA vs. RLA rats.

Toni Cañete, Daniel Sampedro-Viana, Geison Souza Izídio, Berta Baró, Ignasi Oliveras, Cristóbal Río-Álamos, Margalida Coll-Andreu, Adolf Tobeña, Alberto Fernández-Teruel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Toni Cañete *Medical Psychology Unit, Department of Psychiatry & Forensic Medicine, School of Medicine & Institute of Neurosciences, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Daniel Sampedro-Viana *Medical Psychology Unit, Department of Psychiatry & Forensic Medicine, School of Medicine & Institute of Neurosciences, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Geison Souza IzídioBehavioral Genetics Laboratory, Center for Biological Sciences, Department of Cell Biology, Embryology and Genetics, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Berta BaróMedical Psychology Unit, Department of Psychiatry & Forensic Medicine, School of Medicine & Institute of Neurosciences, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Ignasi OliverasDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, International University of Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Cristóbal Río-ÁlamosDepartment of Psychology, School of Medicine, Austral University of Chile, Valdivia, Chile.
Margalida Coll-AndreuDepartment of Psychobiology and Methodology of Health Sciences, Institute of Neurosciences, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Adolf TobeñaMedical Psychology Unit, Department of Psychiatry & Forensic Medicine, School of Medicine & Institute of Neurosciences, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Alberto Fernández-TeruelMedical Psychology Unit, Department of Psychiatry & Forensic Medicine, School of Medicine & Institute of Neurosciences, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The inbred Roman rat strains, which have been selected and bred for their very high (RHA) or extremely poor (RLA) ability to acquire the two-way active avoidance task, constitute a bidirectional genetic model in which each strain differs from the other and/or from "standard" laboratory rat strains in a large number of behavioral and neurobiological phenotypes. Relative to Roman low-avoidance (RLA) rats, the Roman High-avoidance (RHA) rats exhibit increased mesolimbic dopamine function, social deficits, and impaired attention and cognitive flexibility, besides many other neurobehavioral phenotypes that make them a promising animal model of attention/cognitive-related syndromes, such as schizophrenia or attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This study aimed to investigate non-spatial working memory and long-term memory in the Roman rat strains using the Object Recognition Test (ORT), a non-spatial declarative memory task that assesses object memory encoding, consolidation, and retrieval. The Object Location Test (OLT), which measures recognition of object location rather than differences between objects, was also used to evaluate short- and long-term memory. Between-strain spatial working memory differences were also evaluated using a delayed-matching-to-place (DMTP) task in the Morris water maze. Findings showed that RHA rats exhibited impaired working memory and long-term memory compared to RLA rats in the ORT. The degree of previous habituation to the testing context significantly affected object recognition memory in RHA rats. RHA rats also exhibited impaired short-term memory in the OLT. In the DMTP task, spatial working memory was also impaired in RHAs. The memory deficits shown by RHA rats seem to be compatible with their known (schizophrenia-like) alterations of the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. The finding that relatively long habituation to the testing context rescues the long-term object-recognition memory deficit of RHA rats suggests that impaired attention, perhaps related to their relative hyperactivity, might be a factor underlying that deficit. The findings of the present study support the notion that the inbred RHA rat strain presents impairments in both non-spatial and spatial working/short-term memory, aligning with cognitive symptoms observed in patients with schizophrenia or with ADHD.

Indexed as

cognitive deficitslong-term memoryobject locationobject recognitionRHA vs. RLA ratsspatial working memoryworking memory

Identifiers

PMID42428559
PMCPMC13345880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.