Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42428555›Full record

ReviewJournal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques2026

Quality by design in public healthcare: a rapid development framework for future pandemics.

Niranjan Panda, Madhusudan Maity, Vijay Kotra, Bikash Ranjan Jena, Debashish Ghose, Gouri Sankar Jena

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Niranjan PandaSchool of Pharmacy, The Neotia University, Saisha/Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Madhusudan MaitySchool of Pharmacy, The Neotia University, Saisha/Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Vijay KotraDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Quest International University, Ipoh, Malaysia.
Bikash Ranjan JenaSchool of Pharmacy, The Neotia University, Saisha/Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Debashish GhoseDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Health Science, NIST University, Berhampur, Odisha, India.
Gouri Sankar JenaSchool of Pharmacy, The Neotia University, Saisha/Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing number of pandemics and emergencies traversing the world in recent decades has illustrated the vulnerability of the conventional pharmaceutical development process and the necessity of an efficient, robust, and patient-driven pandemic-ready development model. QbD is a scientifically proven proactive approach that has been comprehensively examined recently for its potential to effectively optimize formulations in an accelerated time frame. Risk factor assessment and constant surveillance serve to maintain the product quality & standards before the final stage of large-scale production and offer regulatory pliability. The extension of this method, AQbD, paired side by side also assists in accelerated assessment and quality assurance which is a critical component in any global circumstance. In recent years studies have been done by applying this novel approach, but very little has been reported on the establishment of this approach as a Pandemic-Ready Development Framework. This mini review addresses the regulatory basis alongside the key principles of QbD, which aligns its working approach as optimally compatible with any pandemic situation. Furthermore, it emphasizes the widespread implementation of this approach as AQbD, which stands for swift testing coupled with quality assurance standards. It also focuses on the limitations and critical areas where QbD can be applied to cope with existing demands in near future. Further, it applies this approach in several formulation developments pertinent to pandemic or endemic conditions and discusses the challenges of implementation and future directions. Overall, this discussion stresses the potential of this approach as a very promising framework for future pandemics.

Indexed as

Drug DevelopmentPandemicsPublic HealthHumansQuality ControlAQbDpandemicpatient-centricQbDregulatory framework

Identifiers

PMID42428555
PMCPMC13345975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.