Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42428552›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)

Toward a transcriptomic framework for ultrasound neuromodulation: A perspective on gene expression and regional brain sensitivity.

Joline M Fan, Ehsan Tadayon, Andrew D Krystal, Keith R Murphy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joline M FanDepartment of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1099-8479
Ehsan TadayonDepartment of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Andrew D KrystalDepartment of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Keith R MurphyAttune Neurosciences, San Francisco, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-invasive transcranial ultrasound stimulation (TUS) enables deep brain therapeutic exploration at unprecedented scale. However, its optimal use is limited by the uncertainty surrounding ultrasound sensitivity across brain regions and cell types. This uncertainty often forces selection of sub-optimal parameter-target treatment paradigms guided solely by precedent, rather than an unbiased search of the larger combinatorial space. In principle, human brain-wide gene expression data could allow for a refinement of the search space based on known mechanisms and associated gene expression. In this perspective, we discuss the practicality of genetically informed TUS parameter search in humans using the Allen Brain Atlas and incorporating a broad set of genes related to the hypothesized mechanisms of TUS neuromodulation. We define principal component expression patterns across the brain, enabling dimensionality reduction and spatial clustering of ultrasound-relevant gene expression data. We identify regional clusters of covarying gene expression profiles across the brain topology that are likely to have similar responsivity to TUS. These findings may explain previous perplexities around highly variant neuronal response across brain areas and highlight the need to optimize stimulation parameters in the context of brain region and its molecular profile.

Indexed as

genetic mechanismslow-intensity focused ultrasoundtranscranial ultrasound stimulationultrasound parameters

Identifiers

PMID42428552
PMCPMC13347599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.