Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42428526›Full record

SynthesisPeerJ2026

Comparative efficacy and toxicity of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel

Haoxuan Li, Yingchu Liu, Tianyao Wang, Kunjiang Zhong, Jingyi Xiao, Xinyang Huang

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisComparative Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Haoxuan Li *School of Basic Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yingchu Liu *Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Tianyao WangBeijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Kunjiang ZhongBeijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jingyi XiaoPeking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xinyang HuangBeijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) is a common and aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) characterized by abnormal proliferation of mature B lymphocytes, with a 10-year prevalence of up to 45 cases per 100,000 individuals in European populations and a continuing upward trend. Axicabtagene ciloleucel (Axi-cel) and Tisagenlecleucel (Tisa-cel) are the two most established chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy products for LBCL, yet a systematic comparison of their efficacy and safety in European populations has been lacking. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to address this gap by comprehensively evaluating differences in treatment efficacy and adverse events between Axi-cel and Tisa-cel in European patients with LBCL. Materials and Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and other databases for studies published between January 2020 and February 2026, ultimately including eight European cohort studies with a total of 2,178 patients. Efficacy and survival outcomes comprised 3-month overall response (OR), 3-month complete response (CR), 12-month progression-free survival (PFS), and 12-month overall survival (OS). Toxicity outcomes included 12-month non-relapse mortality (NRM), all-grade and grade ≥ 3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS), all-grade and grade ≥ 3 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), all-grade and grade ≥ 3 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia, as well as tocilizumab use and ICU support. A random-effects model was used for pooled analysis, with sensitivity analyses performed for outcomes exhibiting substantial heterogeneity. Results: Regarding efficacy, Axi-cel was associated with significantly higher 3-month OR and 3-month CR rates compared with Tisa-cel, whereas 12-month PFS was lower in the Axi-cel group. In terms of toxicity, the incidences of all-grade CRS, all-grade ICANS, and grade ≥ 3 ICANS were significantly higher with Axi-cel, and tocilizumab use was more frequent. No statistically significant differences were observed for the remaining outcomes. Conclusions: In European patients with LBCL, Axi-cel demonstrated superior short-term efficacy compared with Tisa-cel, but showed inferior performance on certain intermediate-term efficacy endpoints and was generally associated with greater toxicity and higher healthcare resource utilization. Clinical selection of a CAR-T regimen should be individualized, with careful consideration of efficacy, toxicity, and cost. Future high-quality studies with longer follow-up are needed to evaluate long-term outcomes and to validate the findings of this analysis.

Indexed as

Antigens, CD19Biological ProductsImmunotherapy, AdoptiveLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseReceptors, Antigen, T-CellEuropeHumansTreatment OutcomeAntigens, CD19axicabtagene ciloleucelBiological ProductsReceptors, Antigen, T-CelltisagenlecleucelAxicabtagene ciloleucelChimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapyEfficacyEuropeLarge B-cell lymphomaTisagenlecleucelToxicity

Identifiers

PMID42428526
PMCPMC13348481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.