Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42428520›Full record

ArticleThe South African journal of physiotherapy2026

Gamification in the Medicine and Surgery course for occupational therapy and physiotherapy undergraduate students.

Amanda Jankowitz, Monique M Keller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The South African journal of physiotherapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amanda JankowitzeFundanathi, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Parktown, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8550-8107
Monique M KellerDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Parktown, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1513-295X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gamification has emerged as a transformative pedagogical strategy in health sciences education, offering innovative ways to enhance student engagement, motivation and competency development. This state-of-the-art commentary explores the integration of digital badges into the third-year Medicine and Surgery course for occupational therapy and physiotherapy students at a public university in South Africa. Originally introduced to address contextual and educational challenges, digital badges acted as engagement tools aligned with specific learning outcomes and professional competencies. The inclusion of badges was organically developed by lecturers in response to contextual challenges, including inconsistent face-to-face teaching, low engagement, limited interdisciplinary interaction in an online learning environment, and the need to prepare students for clinical practice in resource-constrained settings. Gamification elements were embedded in Moodle, the learning management system, to scaffold learning progression and support the core competencies outlined by the Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA), including therapeutic and professional relationships, professionalism, communication and ethical practice. Clinical implications: The introduction of gamification and badges may improve clinical, interdisciplinary, and communication skills among undergraduate students. Contextual relevance, inclusive design, and ongoing evaluation incorporating the students' voices are recommended in sound instructional design through active engagement with gamification practices in health sciences education.

Indexed as

clinical practicegamificationhealth professions educationinterdisciplinary educationmedical educationoccupational therapyphysiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID42428520
PMCPMC13347975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.