Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42428502›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026

Prospective evaluation of individualized vancomycin dosing based on a population pharmacokinetic model in patients with severe Gram-positive bacterial infection.

Qile Xiao, Kexin Chen, Jian Qu, Hainan Zhang, Bohan Luo, Wei Wang, Chunyu Wang, Xiaomei Wu, Qihua Chen

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06161870 (Clinical Study of Individualized Vancomycin Dosing Based on Population Pharmacokinetic Model for Severe Infections), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06161870 phase4recruitingnot on this map

Clinical Study of Individualized Vancomycin Dosing Based on Population Pharmacokinetic Model for Severe Infections

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentral South UniversityRan2021 to 2024Enrolled112ConditionsSevere InfectionArmsindividualized vancomycin dosing based on the population pharmacokinetics (PK) model, empirical vancomycin dosing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Qile XiaoDepartment of Neurology, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Kexin ChenDepartment of Neurology, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Jian QuDepartment of Pharmacy, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Hainan ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Bohan LuoDepartment of Neurology, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Wei WangDepartment of Neurology, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Chunyu WangDepartment of Neurology, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xiaomei WuDepartment of Neurology, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Qihua ChenDepartment of Neurology, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling of vancomycin has been validated to accurately predict concentration-time data in sepsis patients, but its effectiveness in clinical practice remains uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the clinical utility of individualized vancomycin dosing guided by a population PK model in patients with severe infections. Methods: This was a single-center, randomized, single-blind, controlled clinical trial. A total of 54 participants with severe infections caused by suspected or confirmed Gram-positive bacteria, who received vancomycin treatment during hospitalization, were prospectively included and identified as eligible. Participants were randomly allocated to either the individualized dosing group guided by a population PK model (n = 28) or the empirical dosing group (n = 26). After a 2-week treatment period, comparisons were made regarding pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) target attainment, clinical efficacy, and safety between the two groups. Results: The individualized dosing group achieved an area under the concentration curve (AUC Conclusion: A daily dosage of individualized administration guided by a population PK model results in improved attainment rates for PK/PD targets and enhanced clinical efficacy without an increased risk of drug-related adverse reactions. Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06161870, identifier NCT06161870.

Indexed as

Gram-positive bacterial infectionindividualized dosingpopulation pharmacokinetic modelingsevere infectionvancomycin

Identifiers

PMID42428502
PMCPMC13345833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.