ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Surgical vs. trans-catheter aortic valve replacement in patients With bicuspid aortic valve stenosis.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Aortic valve stenosis can be treated surgically or with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) anatomy presents unique challenges that may affect procedural outcomes. We aimed to compare outcomes between the two approaches. Methods: a retrospective cohort of 480 patients with BAV stenosis: 75 (16%) underwent TAVI and 405 (84%) underwent SAVR. Median age was 76 (Q1-Q3: 72-82) in the TAVI group and 61 (Q1-Q3: 52-70) in the SAVR group. Patients with isolated aortic insufficiency were excluded. Primary analyses were adjusted for age, sex, and comorbidities, followed by a sensitivity analysis using 1:1 age matching. Outcomes included overall survival, stroke/TIA, pacemaker implantation, paravalvular leak, and heart failure hospitalizations. Results: During a mean follow-up of 9 ± 5 years, 72 patients died (28 TAVI, 44 SAVR). TAVI was associated with higher mortality (adjusted HR = 5.9, 95% CI 2.6-12.9, Conclusions: In BAV stenosis, SAVR was associated with better survival and fewer complications than TAVI, while stroke/TIA rates were similar. Randomized trials are needed to determine the optimal treatment approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.