ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Case Report: The "metal ring" phenomenon: a rare cause of recurrent in-stent restenosis.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recurrent in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a challenging issue in coronary intervention. Localized intractable ISR caused by a non-expandable metal ring is extremely rare. This report describes a rare case of recurrent in-stent restenosis attributable to a non-dilatable metal ring and demonstrates a viable interventional strategy for its management. Case presentation: A 64-year-old female patient was admitted with complaints of "intermittent chest pain for over one year, worsening over the past 10 days". In June 2022, the patient underwent drug-eluting stent implantation in the proximal-to-mid right coronary artery (RCA) for acute coronary syndrome. She experienced recurrent angina at 4 and 9 months post-procedure, with coronary angiography on both occasions revealing 95% ISR in the RCA. During the third intervention on January 31, 2023, optical coherence tomography (OCT) identified a non-dilatable metal ring at the site of severe stenosis. Attempts to disrupt the ring using intravascular lithotripsy and high-pressure non-compliant balloon inflation were unsuccessful. Ultimately, a modified Side Flap Technique was employed: a guidewire was advanced through the lesion lateral to the metal ring, enabling successful stent-in-stent implantation at the original site of the metal ring in the mid-RCA with adequate expansion. Post-procedural symptoms resolved substantially, and the patient remained free of major adverse cardiovascular events during three years of follow-up. Conclusion: Non-dilatable intracoronary metal rings represent an exceedingly rare cause of recurrent ISR following stent implantation. OCT plays an essential role in identifying such structural lesions. When conventional dilation techniques fail, a modified Side Flap Technique combined with stent-in-stent strategy may represent a feasible bail-out approach in this clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.